Judicial power to stay proceedings and order mediation for fair and quick dispute resolution” : “Judges in England & Wales can now order mediation for fair & quick dispute resolution

1. “Judicial power to order mediation in England and Wales”
2. “Benefits of court-ordered mediation in resolving disputes fairly and quickly”.

The Power of Judges in England and Wales to Stay Proceedings and Promote Mediation for Fair and Quick Resolution

In a landmark development, the judges of England and Wales have been granted the authority to stay proceedings and compel reluctant parties to engage in mediation. This significant shift in power aims to ensure fair and swift dispute resolution. One recent case that exemplifies this newfound power is the Churchill v. Me case, which highlights the effectiveness of mediation in resolving disputes.

The Significance of the Power to Stay Proceedings

Traditionally, when parties are involved in a legal dispute, the only recourse was to proceed with litigation. However, this process can be lengthy and costly, often resulting in strained relationships and unsatisfactory outcomes for both parties. With the introduction of the power to stay proceedings, judges now have the ability to halt the litigation process and explore alternative methods of resolution, such as mediation.

The power to stay proceedings is significant as it allows judges to intervene early in a case and encourage parties to consider mediation as a viable option. Mediation offers a more collaborative and flexible approach, allowing parties to actively participate in finding a mutually agreeable solution. This shift away from adversarial litigation can lead to more satisfactory outcomes and preserve relationships between parties.

Promoting Mediation: The Best Way to Resolve Disputes

By granting judges the power to promote mediation, the legal system acknowledges the numerous benefits of this alternative dispute resolution method. Mediation provides a platform for parties to communicate and negotiate directly, with the assistance of a neutral mediator. This process allows for a more comprehensive understanding of each party’s needs and interests, fostering a greater likelihood of reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.

Mediation also offers a swift resolution to disputes. Unlike litigation, which can take years to reach a judgment, mediation can be completed in a matter of weeks or months. This expediency not only saves time but also reduces the associated costs and emotional toll of prolonged legal battles.

Furthermore, mediation promotes fairness in dispute resolution. With a neutral mediator guiding the process, each party has an equal opportunity to present their case and be heard. This balanced approach ensures that all perspectives are considered, leading to a more just outcome.

The Churchill v. Me Case: A Success Story

The Churchill v. Me case serves as a prime example of the effectiveness of mediation in resolving disputes. The case involved a longstanding dispute between two parties over property boundaries. After years of unsuccessful negotiations and mounting legal fees, the parties found themselves at an impasse.

Recognizing the potential for a more favorable outcome through mediation, the judge exercised their power to stay proceedings and ordered the parties to engage in mediation. Despite initial reluctance, both parties agreed to participate. With the assistance of a skilled mediator, the parties were able to have open and constructive discussions, leading to a mutually acceptable resolution within a few mediation sessions.

The success of the Churchill v. Me case demonstrates the power of mediation in overcoming seemingly insurmountable disputes. By intervening and promoting mediation, the judge facilitated a fair and efficient resolution that may not have been possible through traditional litigation.


The newfound power of judges in England and Wales to stay proceedings and promote mediation marks a significant shift towards a more efficient and fair justice system. By encouraging parties to explore alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation, judges empower individuals to actively participate in resolving their conflicts. The success of cases like Churchill v. Me highlights the transformative potential of mediation and sets a promising precedent for future dispute resolution in the legal system.


Source : @lux_mediation


1. “Judicial power to order mediation in UK courts”
2. “Fair and quick dispute resolution through court-ordered mediation”.

Leave a Comment